Whitehurst v. . Pettipher

Claek, J.:

When this case was reached on the regular call of the docket, it appeared that the printed copies of the record, required by Rule 28 of the Rules of this Court, had not been filed. Thereupon, the appeal was dismissed.

The appellant, on five days’ notice of his motion, required by Rule 29, seeks now to have the appeal reinstated on the docket. As stated by the Court in Horton v. Green, 104 N. C., 400, the rule requiring printed copies of certain pafts of the record is a very reasonable one, and has been rendered necessary for the more careful and prompt consideration of causes by the…