Legal Opinion
Enterline v. Smith
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 12, 1924No. 14942PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, C.
There are six assignments of error in the petition in error, but the contentions made by defendant for a reversal are fully stated in the following paragraph at page 5 of his brief:
“The principal position that we take in this case is that the court .erred in not sustaining motion for new trial.' That the court committed further error in its charge to the jury. That the court committed further error in that he failed to charge the jury fully or properly with relation to the law of the case according to the pleadings and the evidence of the case. That the instructions given…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Texas Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- McIntire v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Riser v. HerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. v. ArmourSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Newell v. MusgroveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.