Legal Opinion

Enterline v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 12, 1924No. 14942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

There are six assignments of error in the petition in error, but the contentions made by defendant for a reversal are fully stated in the following paragraph at page 5 of his brief:

“The principal position that we take in this case is that the court .erred in not sustaining motion for new trial.' That the court committed further error in its charge to the jury. That the court committed further error in that he failed to charge the jury fully or properly with relation to the law of the case according to the pleadings and the evidence of the case. That the instructions given…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. McIntire v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Riser v. HerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. v. ArmourSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Newell v. MusgroveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API