Legal Opinion

Roxana Petroleum Corp. v. Dormire

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 24, 1933No. 21484PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Noble county by Emma E. Dormiré, as plaintiff, against Roxana Petroleum Corporation, Sinclair Oil & Gas Company, and Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation, foreign corporations, and O. G. Smith, Ted Hoss, and John Hepler, local residents, as defendants, seeking recovery of damages to a certain tract of land situated in Noble county, alleged to have accrued to plaintiff by reason of the negligent operation of certain oil and gas wells by the defendants, whereby salt water and other deleterious substances had permia-nently polluted and destroyed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Comar Oil Co. v. HackneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Bell v. TackettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Mid-Co Pipe & Supply Co. v. Central Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. DonaheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Wood Oil Co. v. EndicottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API