Legal Opinion

Penas v. Cherveny

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 1917No. Nos. 20,083—(218)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in the district court for McLeod county by the guardian of Josephine Cherveny against Anna A. Cherveny, Louis Cherveny, Frank Cherveny and Elizabeth Cherveny to recover $115, the value of certain supplies due to his ward under the written contract set out in the opinion. The case was tried before Morrison, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of defendants. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff, as guardian of Josephine Cherveny, an insane person, to recover the value of certain articles of *428provisions to be furnished to the plaintiff’s ward under a certain contract with her son.

The trial court found that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover and ordered judgment for the defendants. From an order denying a new trial plaintiff appealed.

On the eleventh day of February, 1907, Josephine Cherveny was the owner of a farm of 60 acres in McLeod county in this state, upon which there was a mortgage of $1,000. On that day she conveyed the farm by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bruer v. BruerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tate v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Smith v. ZuckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Gamble v. MosloskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. Walsh v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Citizens Trust Co. v. Metzger, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API