Legal Opinion

Smith v. Zuckman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1938No. 31,838PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining defendant’s general demurrer to his complaint.

This suit was brought by plaintiff as general administrator of the estate of one Albert Montgomery Smith, deceased, to recover damages and for injunctive relief upon the claim that defendant had breached a written contract entered into by decedent and defendant on December 31, 1935. The contract is pleaded as an exhibit attached to and forming part of the complaint. As far as here material it provides:

“This Agreement, made by and between Al. M. Smith, doing business as Al. M.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Delaware County Commissioners v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Marvel v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  3. Browne v. FairhallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Eastern Advertising Co. Ex Rel. Southern Street Railway Advertising Co. v. George K. McGaw & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  5. Standard Sewing-Machine Co. v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Egner v. States Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Locals 1140 & 1145, United Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers of America v. United Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Peaseley v. VIRGINIA IRON, COAL AND COKE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Hordin v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Peaseley v. VIRGINIA IRON, COAL AND COKE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API