Legal Opinion

Tate v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 18, 1949No. 33275PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHalley, J.

This action was commenced by Sinclair Murphy, as administrator of the estate of Maggie Ever-hart, deceased, against Ada Tate and others, to recover certain lands located in McClain county, with rents therefrom, and certain moneys and interest thereon, all of which was conveyed and transferred to Ada Tate by Maggie Everhart during her lifetime. Damages for clouding title were alleged, but this claim was abandoned. The defendants, other than Ada Tate, were disposed of by the trial court, and are not parties to this appeal by Ada Tate from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. We shall refer to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Miller v. FolsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Weitz v. MouldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Canfield v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Antle v. HartmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Matter of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Tuckwiller v. TuckwillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Dann v. SandsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  5. Jones v. NovotnySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API