Legal Opinion

Denis v. Metzenbaum

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1923No. 17278PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

—Respondent, Victoria Denis, as executrix of the last will of James Palmer, deceased, brought this action to recover upon a promissory note for $500, signed by appellants Walter Metzenbaum and A. A. McCafferty, and in which the deceased was named as payee. Following a trial to the court, judgment was entered against each óf the appellants and against the community of Walter and Rose M|etzenbaum for the amount due upon the note. From this judgment, the appeal is prosecuted.

It is conceded by the respondent that the entry of a personal judgment against Mrs. Metzenbaum was error, and is conceded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. BaillieWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Engstrom v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Spencer v. TerrelWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Kline v. SteinWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Fidelity National Bank v. CunninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Erickson v. KERR, MDPS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wildman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  3. Proff v. MaleyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Steward v. BoundsWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Rucker v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API