Legal Opinion

Proff v. Maley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1942No. 28635PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

This is an action for contribution. Proff, William Maley, and two others, T. F. Donahoe and M. W. Merritt, were stockholders in the Rosalia Supply Company. In 1920, the company had become so financially involved that it could not raise money on its own credit. On November 6th, that year, Proff, Maley, Donahoe, and Merritt executed two promissory notes— one for $1,628.04, the other for $5,068.95 — payable to Whitman County National Bank, which immediately endorsed them over to A. J. Stone. The proceeds of these notes were devoted to the use and benefit of the Rosalia Supply Company. Later on,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Phillips-Jones Corp. v. ParmleySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Van Lehn v. MorseWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Way v. Lyric Theater Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Appleford v. Snake River Mining, Milling & Smelting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Horton v. Donohoe Kelly Banking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fisher v. HagstromWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Key v. Cascade Packing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Fies v. StoreyWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Hanson v. HansonWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Sound Built Homes, Inc. v. Windermere Real Estate/South, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API