Legal Opinion

Dexter Horton National Bank v. McKenzie

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1912No. 10400PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Myers, J., entered April 8, 1912, affirming the action of the board of equalization in refusing to reduce an assessment, after a hearing on certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtPaekeb, J.

The Dexter Horton National Bank, of Seattle, deeming itself aggrieved by the action of the board of equalization for King county, for the year 1911, in denying its application to reduce the assessment of that year, made by the county assessor upon its shares of capital stock by deducting therefrom the assessed value of real estate claimed to be owned by it, sought by writ of certiorari to have the action of the board of equalization reviewed and corrected by the superior court for King county. Upon the return of the writ, a trial was had in that court, resulting in a judgment denying the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Owensboro National Bank v. OwensboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. State ex rel. Wolfe v. ParmenterWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hoyt v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Stroh v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Ridpath v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. State Board of EqualizationWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. McCornick & Co. v. BassettUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Chase National Bank v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Spokane & Eastern Trust Co. v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Scandinavian American Bank v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API