Legal Opinion

United States v. Ackert

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 26, 1999No. 97-6293PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

169 F.3d 136

83 A.F.T.R.2d 99-1040, 99-1 USTC P 50,298

UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,

v.

David A. ACKERT, Respondent-Appellee,

Paramount Communications, Inc. (now Viacom International,

Inc.), CPW Investments Ltd., CPW Holdings, Inc., Nieu

Oranjestad Partnership, Nieuw Oranjestad Partnership and

Maarten Investerings Partnership,

Intervenors-Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.

Docket Nos. 97-6293, 97-6333.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued June 18, 1998.

Decided Feb. 26, 1999.

Kenneth W. Rosenberg, Washington, D.C. (Loretta C. Argrett, Assistant Attorney…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. United States v. AckertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. MejiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. Viacom, Inc. v. Sumitomo Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. Gucci America, Inc. v. Guess?, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  4. Allied Irish Banks v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  5. Egiazaryan v. ZalmayevDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API