United States v. Ackert
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEVAL, Circuit Judge:
The United States of America appeals from a decision of the district court (William I. Garfinkel, Magistrate Judge) in a tax summons enforcement proceeding, barring the Internal Revenue Service from questioning Respondent David A. Ackert, an investment banker, about his conversations with Paramount Corporation’s counsel, by reason of Paramount’s attorney-client privilege. We reverse.
BACKGROUND
The relevant facts are not in dispute. In 1989, Goldman, Sachs, and Co., an investment banking firm, approached Paramount with an investment proposal. The proposed transaction was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
3Cited by42 opinions
- Cavallaro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Lluberes v. UNCOMMON PRODUCTIONS, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Commissioner of Revenue v. Comcast Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. Sealed Air Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Ferko v. National Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.