Legal Opinion
Dinger v. Department of Workforce Services, Workforce Appeals Board
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided March 7, 2013No. 20120093-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MeHUGH, Judge:
11 Carl Dinger challenges the decision of the Workforce Appeals Board (the Board) that he is ineligible for unemployment benefits following his termination from the Utah Transit Authority (UTA). We decline to disturb the Board's decision.
BACKGROUND
{2 Dinger was hired as a UTA police officer on March 24, 2008, and worked there until his July 15, 2011 termination for insubordination. UTA's "Letter of Termination" indicates that the decision to fire Dinger was based on his "repeated refusal to comport [himself] in conformance with [UTA policies]," despite "five informal notices of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. WinfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. DeanUtah Supreme Court · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hoffman v. Peace Officer StandardsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
- Utah Paiute Tribal Housing v. Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- Onysko v. Dept. of Envntl. QualityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- Wintle-Butts v. Career Service Review OfficeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013