Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Peace Officer Standards
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided March 10, 2022No. 20200329-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
2022 UT App 34
THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS CHARLES HOFFMAN, Petitioner, v. PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING COUNCIL, Respondent. Opinion No. 20200329-CA Filed March 10, 2022 Original Proceeding in this Court Jeremy G. Jones and Richard Willie, Attorneys for Petitioner Sean D. Reyes and Catherine F. Jordan, Attorneys for Respondent JUDGE DIANA HAGEN authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES GREGORY K. ORME and RYAN D. TENNEY concurred. HAGEN, Judge: ¶1 The Peace Officer Standards and Training Act (the Act) permits the decertification of a peace officer who “refuses to respond, or fails to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Holder v. Humanitarian Law ProjectSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. FramptonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- King v. Provo City Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
- State v. YourenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026