Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Reuther

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1981No. Docket 52046Published

1DissentBronson, J.

I agree with the majority except insofar as they find no merit to defendant’s argument that the trial court lacked authority to impose a probationary period in excess of two years. In my opinion, this assertion is meritorious. The issue of whether two-year misdemeanors are to be treated as felonies or misdemeanors has arisen in various contexts in this Court. None of this Court’s opinions, however, has affirmatively acknowledged what I perceive to be a split of authority on this particular issue.

By MCL 333.7401(2)(c); MSA 14.15(7401)(2)(c) possession of marijuana with the intent to deliver is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Melia v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. RennoMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. RosecrantsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. Bernard SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API