People v. Reuther
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentBronson, J.
I agree with the majority except insofar as they find no merit to defendant’s argument that the trial court lacked authority to impose a probationary period in excess of two years. In my opinion, this assertion is meritorious. The issue of whether two-year misdemeanors are to be treated as felonies or misdemeanors has arisen in various contexts in this Court. None of this Court’s opinions, however, has affirmatively acknowledged what I perceive to be a split of authority on this particular issue.
By MCL 333.7401(2)(c); MSA 14.15(7401)(2)(c) possession of marijuana with the intent to deliver is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Melia v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. RennoMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. RosecrantsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. Bernard SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.