Timmerman v. Universal Corrugated Box MacHinery Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtR. M. Maher, J.
This appeal by the plaintiffs arises from a jury verdict of no cause of action in their products liability suit against the manufacturer of the machine which injured James L. Timmerman (hereinafter "plaintiff’).
On June 16, 1970, plaintiff was operating a machine known as a "printer-slotter” for his employer, Stone Container Corporation. The machine prints labels and other material on heavy cardboard and then fabricates same into boxes. The machine is large and utilizes 250-pound rollers. There is a clearance between rollers of 0.007 inches. The rollers require inking and adjustment along…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Funk v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Dooms v. Stewart Bolling & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Tulkku v. MacKworth Rees Division of Avis Industries, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Kujawski v. CohenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rasch v. City of East JordanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Tulkku v. MacKworth Rees Division of Avis Industries, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Ritchie v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- John Coleman v. Western Electric Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Bishop v. Interlake, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.