Legal Opinion

Ralston v. Robinson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 25, 1982No. 80-2049PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

We granted certiorari in this case, 452 U. S. 960 (1981), to decide whether a youth offender who is sentenced to a consecutive adult term of imprisonment while serving a sentence imposed under the Federal Youth Corrections Act (YCA), 18 U. S. C. §5005 et seq., must receive YCA treatment for the remainder of his youth sentence. The Courts of Appeals are in conflict on this issue.1 We conclude that the YCA does not require such treatment if the judge imposing the subsequent adult sentence determines that the youth will not benefit from further YCA treatment during the remainder of his youth…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Richard B. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. United States v. Mark Kevin BinderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Michael E. WyattCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Carl P. FogelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. United States v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API