Legal Opinion

State v. Haggblom

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1968PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

Defendant was charged with three related felonies committed in an armed assault and attempt to rape. He pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity, and was convicted by a jury. He appeals from coneurent sentences of ten years on each count.

Defendant by his assignment of error urges that we require tiie state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was sane, and that we modify the M’Naghten rule as a test of responsibility in criminal eases. Defendant’s first contention is foreclosed by ORS 136.390. ① The M’Naghten rule question has been fully considered by our prior decisions, to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. State v. LelandOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State of Oregon v. GarverOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State v. WallaceOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  5. State v. HassingOregon Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. VogelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. State v. BostromCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. Commonwealth v. KapplerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. KapplerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API