State v. Bostrom
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
Defendant appeals from conviction of sodomy, ORS 167.040. Defendant pleaded not guilty and gave notice of his intent to rely on insanity as a defense. ORS 135.870. Preceding selection of a jury, the court heard testimony from defendant and two psychiatrists who had examined the defendant as a basis from which to determine whether the defendant understood the nature of the proceedings and was able to assist in his own defense. Then the court found “that this man does understand sufficiently the nature of the proceedings and is sufficiently able to assist * * * in his defense so that the trial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- State v. LelandOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- State of Oregon v. GarverOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. WallaceOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- State v. HenkeWashington Supreme Court · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. LemeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970