Commonwealth v. Kappler
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1ConcurrenceAbrams, J.
The present case illustrates the difficulties which arise when the prosecution bears the burden of proving criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt. In 1976, when we decided Kostka, only twenty-three States required the defendant to prove lack of criminal responsibility. Commonwealth v. Kostka, 370 Mass. 516, 527 (1976). Currently, thirty-six jurisdictions (including the Federal government and the District of Columbia) place on the defendant the burden of proving lack of criminal responsibility.1 Were I to reconsider our decision in Kostka, supra, I *602would join the increasing majority…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- In Re FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Commonwealth v. KostkaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Hoey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- State v. DiPagliaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.