Legal Opinion
United States v. Brock-Davis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 2, 2007No. 06-30565PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
This case is an appeal by Rose Brock-Davis (“Brock-Davis”) of an order of restitution to cover, among other things, testing and cleanup costs for a motel room she occupied during the course of a conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine. Restitution was imposed pursuant to the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 (“MVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3663A. The parties agree that this statute applies and we accept their agreement that it applies. We address in turn Brock-Davis’ multiple contentions.
Brock-Davis contends, first, that there was no statutory authorization for the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Landreth Timber Co. v. LandrethSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Robert S. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. WaknineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. James LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. YeungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Randly BegayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. BatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.