Legal Opinion
United States v. Batson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 21, 2010No. 09-50238PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents a question of first impression in this circuit, namely, whether federal courts may order restitution as a condition of supervised release for offenses set forth in Title 26 of the United States Code (the Internal Revenue Code). Having been subjected to such an order, appellant Alma Batson argues that the authority of the federal courts to order restitution is limited to restitution authorized or required by the Victim and Witness Protection Act (“VWPA”) and the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (“MVRA”), neither of which includes restitution for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. James Earl MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Robert S. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. NachtigalSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Kwame KilpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. HassebrockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. James LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Tamny WestbrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. John RankinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.