United States v. Yeung
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
Judy Yeung appeals from a restitution order imposed by the district court after a jury convicted Yeung of various crimes associated with her involvement in a fraudulent real estate investment scheme. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We hold that the district court failed to provide an adequate explanation of its reasoning in calculating the amount of restitution owed to two of the victims and, therefore, vacate that portion of the restitution order. We remand for recalculation and explanation of the award pursuant to the Mandatory Victims…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. WaknineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Burt, Lemuel CarlCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Robers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- United States v. Nivis MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. FoleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- United States v. ZangariCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.