Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Brown v. Woodruff

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1865PublishedCited by 47 opinions

The statement of the case will be found in the opinion of Davies, J., given at length. I. The only question in the case is as to the authority of the comptroller of the city of New York to exercise the power of appointment of commissioners of taxes and assessments more than once, under the Laws of 1859 (ch. 302). 1. The powers given to the comptroller by that act arc specific and definite, and to be exercised immediately after the passage of such act, and having been thus…

Read the full summary

The statement of the case will be found in the opinion of Davies, J., given at length. I. The only question in the case is as to the authority of the comptroller of the city of New York to exercise the power of appointment of commissioners of taxes and assessments more than once, under the Laws of 1859 (ch. 302). 1. The powers given to the comptroller by that act arc specific and definite, and to be exercised immediately after the passage of such act, and having been thus exercised, are exhausted. Such power of appointment is limited by the words of the act to a single appointment for the…

1Opinion of the CourtDavies, J.

The facts, as agreed on in this action, are as follows:

1. That the relator was, on the third day of May, 1859, appointed by Robert T. Haws, then being comptroller of the city and county of Hew York, to the office of commissioner of taxes and assessments for the city and county of Héw York, in pursuance of chap. 302, of the Laws of 1859, passed April 14,1859.

2. That on the same day, Jonathan W. Allen and Amor J. Williamson were also appointed by the said comptroller, commissioners of taxes and assessments in and for said city, under and in pursuance of said act.

3. That on the 4th day of May,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Loew v. BatchelorNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Tappan v. GrayNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
  3. Adams v. MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. In Re Hollister Bank of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  5. Pell v. UlmarNew York Supreme Court · 1856

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Tompkins v. . HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Marine Forests Society v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Fox v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Speed v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API