Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Musa v. Minear

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1965PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

The relator brings this proceeding in the nature of quo warranto to challenge the right of Leon P. Minear to hold office as superintendent of public instruction.

The case presents two questions: (1) Is ORS 326.005 (1) (Oregon Laws 1961, ch 624, §1), under the provisions of which the superintendent holds office, constitutional? (2) If not, does it necessarily follow that the incumbent must vacate the office?

The answer to both questions is “no.”

Oregon Constitution, Art VIII, § 1, provides:

“The Governor shall be superintendent of public instruction, and his powers, and duties in that capacity…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Everding v. SimonOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State Ex Rel. O'Hara v. ApplingOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. TazwellOregon Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Selective Life Insurance v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Dean v. CrispCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. American Independent Party in Idaho, Inc. v. CenarrusaIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. STATE, EX REL. ADAMS v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Project Veritas v. Michael SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API