Legal Opinion

Tifer v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 28, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs and matter remitted to respondent Superintendent for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Because the inmate misbehavior report was authored by an eyewitness to the events alleged in the report and the events are stated in sufficient detail, the report constitutes substantial evidence in support of the determination that petitioner violated two inmate rules (see, Matter of Perez v Wilmot, 67 NY2d 615, 616-617). We conclude, however, that the Hearing Officer erred in directing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Perez v. WilmotNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Laureano v. KuhlmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Nelson v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Hillard v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Hartje v. CoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Mullen v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. ROBINSON, EDDIE M. v. FISCHER, BRIANAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API