Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner was found guilty following a Tier III hearing of violating inmate rules 114.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [15] [i] [smuggling]) and 180.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [26] [i] [violating facility visiting procedures]). Although the proof is entirely circumstantial, the determination of the Hearing Officer is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Fereira v Coombe, 239 AD2d 905). It is well established that a Hearing Officer may rely on confidential information (see, Matter of Abdur-Raheem v Mann, 85…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MTR. OF ABDUR-RAHEEM v. MannNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Vogelsang v. CoombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Vogelsang v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Cowart v. PicoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Freeman v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mullady v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API