Legal Opinion
Gustafson v. Bi-State Development Agency
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided February 13, 2019No. 4:18-CV-2074 CASPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES A. SHAW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter is before the Court on defendant Bi-State Development Agency of *918the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District's ("defendant") motion to dismiss plaintiff's third amended complaint under Rule 12(b)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for lack of standing, and Rule 12(b)(6), Fed. R. Civ. P., for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff Scott Gustafson ("plaintiff") opposes the motion to dismiss and it is fully briefed. For the following reasons, the motion will be granted as to plaintiff's Missouri Human Rights…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Schaaf v. Residential Funding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Edgar Alfonzo Banks v. Kansas City Area Transportation AuthorityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021