Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Hamilton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1936No. 5684PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELIAS HANSEN, Chief Justice.

Defendant prosecutes this appeal from an order amending a decree of divorce. He contends that the court below was without jurisdiction to make the amendment complained of. There is no dispute as to the facts. On March 29, 1928, plaintiff brought suit for divorce in the district court of Salt Lake county, Utah. She alleged in her complaint that she and the defendant were husband and wife; that she was, and for more than one year next prior to the commencement of her suit had been, an actual and bona fide resident of Salt Lake county, state of Utah; that there were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Howell v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Soule v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. McCormick v. McCormickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Cody v. CodyUtah Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Howarth v. HowarthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Georgedes v. GeorgedesUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Arnold v. DelgadilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Georgedes v. GeorgedesUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Zaharias v. ZahariasUtah Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API