Barillaro v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Mencer,
These appeals were taken individually by Nancy Fotia and Nancy M. Barillaro (claimants) and were consolidated for argument before this Court since both cases involve the same issues.
The referee decided that claimants were ineligible, under Section 402(a) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Act), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802 (a),1 to receive unemployment compensation benefits *327because they refused offers of suitable work without good cause. The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirmed, and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Barclay White Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Philadelphia Transportation Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Lattanzio v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Brilhart Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Johnson v. Virginia Employment Com'nCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
- Anchor Darling Valve Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Levan v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Rising v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Sill-Hopkins v. Unemp. Comp. Bd. of Rev.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.