Legal Opinion

Maupin v. Bearden

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1986No. 14442PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs own real property which adjoins property owned by the defendants. Under § 228.340, RSMo 1978, plaintiffs sought a “way of strict necessity” over defendants’ property to a public road. Commissioners were appointed to locate the “private” road and assess defendants’ damages. Their report assessed damages at $4,500. After plaintiffs’ objection by motion to the damages found by the commissioners, the trial court entered a “judg*800ment” establishing the roadway and granting defendants $2,000 in damages.

Defendants then filed a motion asking that the judgment be set…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Tri-City Construction Co. v. MarshMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Hardy v. McNarySupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  3. Madison v. SheetsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. Daniels v. RichardsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Hollars v. Church of God of the Apostolic Faith, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gerken v. EppsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Maupin v. BeardenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API