Legal Opinion

Maupin v. Bearden

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1988No. 15390PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Following jury trial plaintiffs appeal from a judgment awarding defendants $5000 in damages. The facts and nature of this action are set forth in two earlier appeals. Maupin v. Bearden, 643 S.W.2d 860 (Mo.App.1982); Maupin v. Bearden, 708 S.W.2d 799 (Mo.App.1986).

*404The statement of facts in appellants’ brief has no references to the legal file or transcript. In the argument section of the brief there is no reference to the legal file and only one reference to the transcript, quoting a portion of defendants’ attorneys closing argument. Rule 84.04(h) states: “Page References in Briefs. All…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stegan v. H. W. Freeman Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Stephan v. World Wide Sports, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Cribbs v. Keystone American Service Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Maupin v. BeardenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Maupin v. BeardenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McNear v. RhoadesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API