Hollars v. Church of God of the Apostolic Faith, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
Defendant appeals from a judgment establishing a private road of necessity over its property. § 228.340, RSMo 1969. Defendant contends that this statute is not applicable because a public road passes alongside plaintiffs’ land.
Plaintiffs own 40 acres immediately west of defendant’s property. An accessible public road runs along the northern boundary of plaintiffs’ property. A “gorge”, “canyon”, “hollow”, “valley”, or “ravine”, as it is variously described, runs in an east-west direction dividing plaintiffs’ property approximately in half. We believe, based on the testimony and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- English Realty Company v. MeyerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- Wiese v. ThienSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
- McCluggage v. LoomisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
- Curtman v. PiezuchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Owens v. BrownlieSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Orvis v. GarmsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- King v. Jack Cooper Transport Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- MAZZANTE v. McClintockCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- McBride v. FarleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.