Legal Opinion · Dissent

Farbo v. School Dist. No. 1 of Toole Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1933No. 7,203Published

1DissentJustice Angstman

I am in accord with what is said in the majority opinion as to the purpose of the constitutional provisions limiting the amount of indebtedness of school districts and other subdivisions of the state. I am unable to agree, however, with the conclusion there stated that the defendant school district has exceeded its limit of indebtedness within the meaning of section 6, Article XIII of our Constitution. It should be kept in mind, too, that this section of the Constitution does not deal with expenditures, but with indebtedness. If the present indebtedness of the defendant school district is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Toomey v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  2. City of Council Bluffs v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  3. State Ex Rel. Tipton v. EricksonMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State ex rel. Rankin v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State Ex Rel. Kain v. FischlMontana Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API