Legal Opinion

Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library v. Charlier Clark & Linard, P.C.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 2009No. 06A05-0804-CV-239PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Chief Judge.

We once again turn the page and delve into another chapter of the saga surrounding the renovation and expansion of the Central Library Project in Indianapolis. Perhaps our discussion below may best be summarized as follows:

When only economic harm is involved, the question becomes " 'whether the consuming public as a whole should bear the cost of economic losses sustained by those who failed to bargain for adequate contract remedies. "[1]

And, as New York Court of Appeals Chief Judge Benjamin Cardozo recognized:

If liability for negligence exists, a thoughtless slip or…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. In Re Chicago Flood LitigationIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Redarowicz v. OhlendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Bilt-Rite Contractors, Inc. v. Architectural StudioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library v. Charlier Clark & Linard, P.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Kb Home Indiana Inc. v. Rockville Tbd Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library v. Charlier Clark & Linard, PCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library v. Charlier Clark & Linard, P.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API