Legal Opinion

Christenot v. State, Dept. of Commerce

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1995No. 94-539PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage

The State of Montana, Department of Commerce, Board of Dentistry (Board), appeals an injunctive order issued by the District Court for the Nineteenth Judicial District, Lincoln County. That court declared invalid three administrative rules adopted by the Board, as improper interpretations of §§ 37-29-402(2) and -403, MCA. The court denied, without prejudice, the plaintiffs’ request for costs and attorney fees. The Board appeals the declaration of invalidity as to Rule 8.17.808, ARM. The plaintiffs cross-appeal. We reverse the District Court’s ruling that Rule 8.17.808, ARM, is invalid.

We do…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Board of Barbers of the Department of Professional & Occupational Licensing v. Big Sky College of Barberstyling, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Norfolk Holdings, Inc. v. Montana Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Ring v. HoseltonMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Dover Ranch v. County of YellowstoneMontana Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Giacomelli v. Scottsdale InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Kuhr v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Infinity Insurance v. DodsonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. PriceMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Wiser v. STATE, DEPT. OF COMMERCEMontana Supreme Court · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API