Legal Opinion

Richardson v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided September 30, 1992No. 07-90-0349-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

BOYD, Justice.

The Court of Criminal Appeals, 824 S.W.2d 585, has vacated the earlier judgment of this court and remanded this case to this court for reconsideration of appellant’s points of error in light of Heitman v. State, 815 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). In Heitman, the Court stated that it would not automatically adopt and apply to Art. I, § 9 of the Texas Constitution the United States Supreme Court’s interpretations of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Id. at 681.

In his appeal to this court, appellant had asserted several…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. People v. SporlederSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. Crowell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Uresti v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  3. Richardson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
  4. State v. WaldenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API