Glover v. Hot Springs Kennel Club
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Dissent · HoltJ. Seaborn Holt, J.
I do not agree with the majority view. This action involves the interpretation and construction of Act 191 of the 1957 Legislature. Only a question of law is presented. The facts were not in dispute. The appellants are the Election Commissioners of Garland County Arkansas. Appellee, the Hot Springs Kennel Club, Inc., has its principal place of business in the City of Hot Springs, Arkansas and proceeding under the provisions of Act 191, (Sections 84-2816— 84-2842, inclusive, Ark. Stats. (1947) sought a temporary franchise to conduct greyhound racing in Garland County, Arkansas, and the…
Also in this document: Dissent · Smith.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vance v. AustellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
- Lybrand v. Wafford (1)Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- McClure v. TopfSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Holt v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Deener v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.