Legal Opinion

Dotterer v. Harden

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 23, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mandamus. Practice in Supreme Court. Debtor and creditor. Lien. Assignment. Reported in tbe decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Justice.

Dotterer, trustee, et al., applied to this court for a writ of mandamus nisi requiring the Hon. ¥m. D. Harden (judge of the city court of Savannah, who presided in the superior court of Chatham county in the *146place of Hon. Robt. Falligant, disqualified) to show cause why the former should not certify a bill of exceptions duly tendered to him in the case of Bowe v. The County of Chatham et al., Ms honor, Judge Harden, having refused to certify the same as presented. It appears that Judge Harden declined to certify the bill of exceptions unless counsel for the plaintiff in error…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dotterer v. BoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Pitts v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. ReeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Lester v. Georgia, Car. & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Pelham Manufacturing Co. v. ScaifeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API