Legal Opinion

Pelham Manufacturing Co. v. Scaife

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 22, 1910No. 2122PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application for mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

In answer to the rule nisi served upon him, his honor Judge Scaife does not deny that the statements of fact in the bill of exceptions pendente lite, which he was asked to certify, are true, though he states that his answer is made “without admitting the facts set out in the bill of exceptions pendente lite.” The question arises, therefore, whether the answer of the judge shows any reason why he should not sign the certificate to the bill of exceptions as presented to him. The reason assigned by the judge for declining to certify the exceptions pendente lite can best be given in his own…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. ReeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Hall County v. GilmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Sears ex rel. Baker v. CandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Dotterer v. HardenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Strickland v. FiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Covin v. WillieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Henry v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API