Pitts v. Hall
Supreme Court of Georgia
Mandamus. Practice in the Supreme Court. January-Term, 1818. Reported in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Jackson, Judge.
1. This application is for a ma/ndamus absolute against Judge Hall to certify a bill of exceptions. It should have been an application for a mandamus nisi. Code, §4258.
In one case in 45 Ga., 618 — Dougherty vs. Harvey — the mandamus nisi was dispensed with; but that was where but one single question was made, and the judge was perfectly willing to sign the bill of exceptions, if his doubt on a single question of law in respect to the sole question whether a bill of exceptions to the judgment dissolving an injunction could be presented later than fifteen days after the day of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dougherty v. HarveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
3Cited by6 opinions
- Taylor v. ReeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Cade v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- State ex rel. Repp v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Carhart v. ReviereSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Dotterer v. HardenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.