Legal Opinion

Hozz v. Felder

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 1959No. Civ. 9351PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

This is an action to recover the value of merchandise allegedly sold by plaintiffs to defendants on an open book account. At the close of plaintiffs’ case, defendants’ motion for a nonsuit was denied. At the conclusion of the trial, plaintiffs moved for a directed verdict which likewise was denied. Following the entry of judgment on the verdict of the jury in the sum of $4,402.76, plaintiffs moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. The court granted both motions, but by its order granting a new trial provided that it should be effective only if on appeal the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hames v. RustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Thompson v. MacHadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Tracey v. L. A. Paying Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Vargas v. RuggieroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Moore v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Spillman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API