Legal Opinion

Rendall-Speranza v. Nassim

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 18, 1996No. Civil Action 95-01855PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Before the Court in the above-entitled case are the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment, and the plaintiffs Opposition; the plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint and the defendant’s Opposition; and a motion by amicus curiae the International Finance Corporation (“IFC”) for Leave to File a Supplemental Brief. Upon careful consideration of the parties’ pleadings and the law applicable thereto, and for the reasons expressed below, the Court shall grant the defendant’s Motion…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Darrell R. Page v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  4. Waldon v. CovingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. King v. KiddDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lucero-Nelson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  2. McCoy Ex Rel. Webb v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
  3. Gomez v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Gomez v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Kurd v. Republic of TurkeyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API