Legal Opinion

Brown v. Hauge

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 19, 2001No. 19114-1-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

21 P.3d 716 (2001)

105 Wash.App. 800

Darla A. BROWN & Tom E. Brown, wife and husband, Respondents,

v.

Rudolph HAUGE & Ilena Hauge, husband and wife, individually and the marital community, Petitioners.

No. 19114-1-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Four.

April 19, 2001.

Bruce E. Cox, Layman, Layman & McKinley, Everett B. Coulter, Jr., Evans, Craven & Lackie, Spokane, for Petitioners.

Dustin D. Deissner, Spokane, for Respondents.

SCHULTHEIS, J.

Darla and Tom Brown ran a residential home care facility for elderly people. The facility building was owned by Rudolph and Ilena Hauge, who…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Mesher v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tucker v. HayfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  2. White v. Spenceley Realty, LLCSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2010
  3. Pruitt v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Pinckney v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2007
  5. Tucker v. HayfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API