Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Hayford
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 4, 2003No. 21544-0-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
75 P.3d 980 (2003)
118 Wash.App. 246
Don TUCKER and Shalee Miller, individually; Shalee Miller, as the guardian and parent of Alan Miller and Robert Miller, both minors; and Don Tucker and Shalee Miller, as the guardians and parents of Cheyanne Tucker, a minor, Appellants,
v.
Robert HAYFORD and Dakota Hayford, husband and wife, Respondents.
No. 21544-0-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Nine.
September 4, 2003.
George B. Fearing, Kennewick, WA, for Appellants.
Jeffrey T. Sperline, Rettig, Osborne, Forgette, Kennewick, WA, for Respondents.
OPINION PUBLISHED IN PART
SWEENEY, J.
We again…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Shroades v. Rental Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- McDonald v. MianeckiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Merrill v. JansmaWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Gerlach v. The Cove Apartments, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2020
- Pruitt v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Davis v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Davis v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.