Tucker v. Hayford
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
We again note that a claim for personal injuries by a tenant can be premised on three distinct legal theories: contract (a rental agreement), common law obligations imposed on a landlord, and the Washington Residential Landlord-Tenant Act of 1973 (Landlord-Tenant Act), chapter 59.18 RCW. In Dexheimer v. CDS, Inc.1 we concluded that the remedies available to a tenant under the Landlord-Tenant Act were limited to those outlined in the statute. We were wrong.
Here, the tenants claim that they became sick from drinking contaminated well water provided as part of their tenancy. The trial judge…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Shroades v. Rental Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- McDonald v. MianeckiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tucker v. HayfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003