Wilhelm v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
Randy Wilhelm was convicted of two counts of child molestation and one count of cruelty to children. He appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Because the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions, we affirm.
The standard of review applied to an appeal of a criminal conviction is as follows:
On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence; moreover, an appellate court does not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility but…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Norris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
3Cited by9 opinions
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Hammontree v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Robbins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Lowe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.