Arnold v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
A jury found Gary James Arnold guilty of child molestation, felony obstruction of an officer, and attempted interference with government property. Arnold appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, the trial court’s jury instructions, and the court’s failure to grant a mistrial due to purportedly inadmissible character evidence and impermissible closing argument. For reasons that follow, we affirm.
1. In two enumerations of error, Arnold asserts that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s verdict finding him guilty of child molestation and felony obstruction…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Philmore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- State v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- Camphor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Vines v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Diaz-IbarraCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- WILLIAMS v. HARVEYSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
- Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.