Hammontree v. State

Bernes, Judge.

Jeff Hammontree appeals from his conviction of child molestation. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction and argues that the trial court erred in admitting similar transaction evidence without notice and a hearing and in admitting evidence of an internet instant message conversation. We find no error and affirm.

On appeal, Hammontree no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence. Carey v. State, 281 Ga. App. 816, 817 (637 SE2d 757) (2006). We do not weigh the evidence or judge the credibility of the witnesses but determine only whether, when…