Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Herbrandson v. Vesperman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoNNSON, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding wherein the relator socks to compel the respondents to permit the use of an auditorium owned by the city of Bismarck for a public meeting, at which a lecture or lectures are to be given. Vesperman is manager of the auditorium, and the other respondents are the city commissioners of Bismarck. The auditorium ivas built by the city, paid for out of public funds, and has been commonly used for public meetings of various kinds. The city commission adopted a schedule of rentals several years ago and has exercised control over the building as over other property owned…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Egan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State Ex Rel. Manhattan Const. Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Torrent v. Common Council of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Mogaard v. City of GarrisonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Pettitt v. MayorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Meyer v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Midland Produce Co. v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co. v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. City of Fargo v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. First American Bank & Trust Company v. EllweinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API