Legal Opinion

Meyer v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 1930PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

On August 20, 1928, the council of the city of Cleveland passed a resolution declaring the necessity of constructing a “fireproof stadium on the lake front,” and directed that the question of the issuance of bonds in the amount of $2,500,000 for that purpose be submitted to the voters at the election on November 6, 1928. At that election the voters, by a vote of 112,000 to 77,000, in round numbers, approved the proposition. The bonds were sold and the proceeds are in the treasury.

The city of Cleveland proposes to construct the stadium on the water front directly north of the new court house.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Tombstone v. MacIaArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Adams v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Egan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State Ex Rel. Manhattan Const. Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. County of Los Angeles v. DodgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Greene County Agricultural Society v. LimingOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. City of Oakland v. Oakland RaidersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Greene Cty. Agricultural Soc. v. LimingOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCraneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  5. Hutcheson v. AthertonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API